Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181208
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '20 at 15:16
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 77.9 1-Core 116 2-Core 234 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 723 73% 593 Pts	64-Core 929 58% 929 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3721) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 61.5 Parallax 53.1 0% 38.2 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 68.8 Splatting 0.09 33% 46.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba A100 240GB 5,900 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA10.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 61 45 86 20 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 468 Write 84 Mixed 144 SusWrite 67.7 41% 191 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 27.7 116% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 91.3 DQ Mixed 112 105% 169 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 91%
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 146GB free Firmware: SBFA12.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 100 100 100 102 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 502 Write 445 Mixed 372 SusWrite 141 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 36.3 142% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 211 193% 293 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 90%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40 10,318 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 115GB free Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1454 114 143 123 81 185 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 1,620 Write 1,479 Mixed 1,138 SusWrite 350 256% 1,147 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 45.8 206% 81 MB/s	DQ Read 642 DQ Write 825 DQ Mixed 544 463% 670 MB/s
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 248%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 7GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 284 Write 125 Mixed 176 43% 195 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 87.9 4K Mixed 38.2 140% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 94.8 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 101 79% 107 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 75%
Toshiba THNSNH128GBS 128GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 10GB free Firmware: HTRA SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 38 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 42 Write 38.7 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 38.4 9% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 15.3 4K Mixed 9.4 41% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 31.7 DQ Write 31.2 DQ Mixed 30.7 23% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 623GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 189 189 192 191 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 149 Write 144 Mixed 88.3 SusWrite 188 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 112%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 747GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 109 110 108 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 104 Write 104 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 109 64% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 26.7 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.6 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 24.2 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $88Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,392x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	809x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	471x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	424x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	295x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	294x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	152x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	130x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	389x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	207x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $444

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16