Apple iMac17,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-65CE76090165799A
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 23:44
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 212
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 426
57% 425 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M380
Apple(106B 014B) 2GB
CLim: 1021 MHz, MLim: 1568 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.40.20.10
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 26.8
18% 25.7 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 29
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AQ03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 99 92 111 111 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75% Very good
Read 157
Write 158
Mixed 71
SusWrite 104
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 0x29E 0x434D534F384758334D314331363030433131 0x802C 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 0x29E 0x434D534F384758334D314331363030433131 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback