Empty empty

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
MotherboardTYAN S7012
Memory93.8 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 12:02
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 65.1
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 175
61% 109 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 531
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC H310 508GB
254GB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 518 530 534 525 524 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.3% Excellent
Read 606
Write 250
Mixed 263
SusWrite 528
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 10.1
68% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 88.7
124% 227 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 125 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 124
Write 118
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 123
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-YH9 12x8GB
12 of 18 slots used
96GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 20.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback