Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '20 at 19:42
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 89.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 449
61% 452 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Asus(1043 83A0) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 2.12
Parallax 0.62
2% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.96
2% 2.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
AMD HD 6950-$290
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 24
22% 24.3 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 27.7
20% 23.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 105 105 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 414
Write 149
Mixed 211
SusWrite 107
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 32.4
138% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 166
127% 175 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 105 105 105 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 100
Mixed 69
SusWrite 106
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
278GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 120 122 121 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 93
Write 91.7
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 121
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 87%
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45
372GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 80 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 122
Write 115
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 80
73% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58%
Great: 89%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
957GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 88 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69% Good
Read 152
Write 147
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 88.8
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/8G 9905403-439.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.2% Below average
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback