Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '20 at 23:49
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 88.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 257
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 704
76% 602 Pts
64-Core 841
52% 841 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9942
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 66.6
Parallax 56.8
51% 62.1 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 55
Splatting 58.8
49% 59.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 247 295 283 275 274 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 841
Write 1,076
Mixed 766
SusWrite 298
168% 745 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 67.6
230% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 1145
DQ Mixed 1,026
782% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 170%
Great: 249%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 117
Write 110
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 126
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 22.7
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 27.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback