Acer Aspire 4810T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 4810T  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4810T
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '20 at 11:28
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Solo U3500
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 17
2-Core 16.8
27% 32.8 Pts
4-Core 12
8-Core 18.5
2% 15.2 Pts
64-Core 19.5
1% 19.5 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 022A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.652.1.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.26% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.32 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 0.43
0% 0.29 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.26%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
742GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 91 84 75 50 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47% Average
Read 88.8
Write 104
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 73.8
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
188% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47%
Great: 71%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-75U6AA0 500GB
353GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 20 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.4% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 13.8
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 20.1
25% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CK0 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4810T Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4810T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback