Asus P5N-T DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus P5N-T DELUXE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P5N-T DELUXE
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100319
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 02 '17 at 02:51
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 85.5
44% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 169
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 30.5
30% 33.5 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 32.4
28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1500ADFS-00NLR0 150GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 83.5
Write 83.2
Mixed 81.6
62% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 4.2
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5N-T DELUXE Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus P5N-T DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback