Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100806
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '20 at 17:58
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 86.3 1-Core 46.9 2-Core 94.6 50% 75.9 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 185 25% 185 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.6% Above average	Lighting 62.2 Reflection 67.8 Parallax 60.2 51% 63.4 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 60.8 Splatting 55.2 50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30 32,167 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0125A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 395 Write 367 Mixed 349 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 39.1 130% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 31.9 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 46.6 42% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 372GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 107 106 106 106 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 79.6 Write 80.2 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 107 58% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 297GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 107 106 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 127 Write 130 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 107 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF 9905403-439.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.7% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16