Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 04:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 137
56% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 430
40% 333 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1264) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.23
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 6.59
4% 10.5 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 6.73
Splatting 15
9% 9.96 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 134 112 51 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 597
Write 139
Mixed 194
SusWrite 109
57% 260 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 49.3
179% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 286
195% 240 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback