LG S560-C.AH10K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLG S560-C.AH10K  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta LG4C
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131226
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 04:02
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 116
56% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 130
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1854 1820) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 1.38
2% 1.66 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.76 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 351 351 362 363 362 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 463
Write 430
Mixed 404
SusWrite 360
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 35.1
114% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 258
197% 266 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback