LG S560-C.AH10K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLG S560-C.AH10K  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta LG4C
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 17:19
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 118
56% 89 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 123
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1854 1820) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 1.38
1% 1.65 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.48
2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 362 359 370 372 369 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 451
Write 411
Mixed 358
SusWrite 360
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 21.1
80% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 72.3
DQ Mixed 171
122% 160 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.7% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback