Samsung R528/R728/R538

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung R528/R728/R538  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R528/R728/R538
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '20 at 20:27
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 91.2
41% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 123
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C06A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.81
1% 0.92 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.19 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+ Series 64GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGYA0201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 149 139 118 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 151
Write 172
Mixed 131
SusWrite 131
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 9.7
34% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 10.7
DQ Write 35.6
DQ Mixed 13
13% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 42%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
157GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 159 162 167 173 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.4% Average
Read 177
Write 94
Mixed 158
SusWrite 166
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 15.9
57% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 141
114% 163 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 8325 FSFE85F-B8KL9 4GB
533, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.6
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R528/R728/R538 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R528/R728/R538

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback