Samsung R528/R728/R538

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung R528/R728/R538  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R528/R728/R538
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100621
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 21:49
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 56.9
2-Core 94.3
45% 71.7 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 147
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C06A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.81
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+ Series 64GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGYA0201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 137 133 134 99 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 158
Write 128
Mixed 132
SusWrite 123
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 10.4
33% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 9.8
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 12.1
11% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 42%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
158GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 158 160 155 161 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.4% Average
Read 211
Write 195
Mixed 183
SusWrite 162
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 17.2
63% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 138
113% 161 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 100%
Mass Storage Device 320GB
74GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 24
Write 18.9
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 22
28% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 20%
Single Flash Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 6335
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 5.3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.6
9% 7.65 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 8325 FSFE85F-B8KL9 4GB
533, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.3
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R528/R728/R538 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R528/R728/R538

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback