Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '20 at 23:58
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 85.7 1-Core 50 2-Core 97.8 51% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 152 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Lighting 28.6 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 30.8 23% 30 fps	MRender 28 Gravity 27 Splatting 30.7 24% 28.5 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 393GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 35 38 41 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 66.9 Write 39.6 Mixed 43.3 SusWrite 36 34% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 43%
Maxtor STM3500630A 500GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 396GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 76 76 76 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 74.6 Write 53.8 Mixed 46.6 SusWrite 75.7 46% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 40%
Seagate ST3300631AS 300GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 279GB free Firmware: 3.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 38 40 42 45 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 57.4 Write 27.5 Mixed 41 SusWrite 38.5 31% 41.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	48x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	40x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	5x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,822 samples	6x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples	6x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,501 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16