Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '20 at 21:38
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 359
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.3% Above average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 62.2
52% 65.1 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 56.6
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 192
Write 383
Mixed 223
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 33.8
109% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 39.4
39% 59.4 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 111%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
110GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 109 118 119 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
65% Good
Read 111
Write 27.7
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 115
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65%
Great: 77%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
183GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 73 78 79 74 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 95.8
Write 77
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 77.7
100% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
160% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 61%
WD My Passport 0827 500GB
47GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 76 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 75.3
Write 68.3
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 76.2
88% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 46%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
17GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 27.3
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 26.7
36% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFF65F-D8KM9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 8.7
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback