Asus P8Z68-V

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z68-V (all builds)
Memory	21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '20 at 16:40
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 191 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 468 49% 394 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Lighting 40.2 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 37.9 33% 36.6 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 37.4 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 374 308 307 308 307 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 435 Write 426 Mixed 353 SusWrite 300 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 33.1 111% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 230 209% 319 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 113%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 19GB free Firmware: 0002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 13 44 45 39 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 353 Write 186 Mixed 218 SusWrite 38.3 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 16.9 84% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 99.6 92% 142 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 72%
Hitachi HDT721075SLA360 750GB-$500 394 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 388GB free Firmware: ST4OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 79.6 Write 78.3 Mixed 44 SusWrite 75.8 51% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 63%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 126 127 127 127 129 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 111 Write 115 Mixed 97.6 SusWrite 123 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 85%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 210% 158GB free, PID 61f5 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 234 256 257 257 258 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 303 Write 248 Mixed 268 SusWrite 234 352% 263 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 21.7 1,599% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 29.9 DQ Mixed 27.3 2,042% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 377%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 606GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 86 87 86 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 85.5 Write 86.1 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 85.3 105% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 43%
USB 2.0 Storage Device 160GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 37GB free, PID 5621 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 22 22 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.2% Very poor	Read 19.6 Write 19.2 Mixed 16 SusWrite 21.4 26% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL7-4GBRH 029E CML8GX3M1A1600C9 04CD F3-10666CL7-4GBRH 029E CML8GX3M1A1600C9 24GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.6 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z68-V Builds (Compare 824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V - $390

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	247x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	243x
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	61x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	45x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	28x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	24x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16