Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive9.52% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP530U3C-A0TDE
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131025
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 13:53
Run Duration516 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.35 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 13.3
2-Core 22.6
8% 18 Pts
4-Core 16
8-Core 12.2
2% 14.1 Pts
64-Core 9.2
1% 9.2 Pts
Poor: 29% Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.64 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.72 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX300-240 240GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 57 79 55 91 77 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.52% Terrible
Read 71
Write 55.1
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 71.8
15% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.7
8% 2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 9.52%
Great: 92%
Sandisk i100 24GB
22GB free
Firmware: 11.56.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.5 14 20 23 29 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
1.96% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 17.4
Mixed 10
SusWrite 16.9
4% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
1% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 31%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
694GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 63 98 85 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 229
Write 178
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 94.2
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.7
527% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DM0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
MC Read 1.4
MC Write 1.6
MC Mixed 1.6
4% 1.53 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.3 GB/s
Latency 1,000
4% 1,000 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback