Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 12:06
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 82
2-Core 154
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 422
44% 352 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 6.62
6% 22.8 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 14.5
8% 9.04 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.87
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 54
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 45.9
44% 51.8 fps
MRender 43.7
Gravity 48
Splatting 49.1
39% 46.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 723 528 451 399 399 409 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 872
Write 915
Mixed 911
SusWrite 485
179% 796 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 35.9
123% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 421
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 598
444% 577 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 128%
Great: 181%
FD Fantom 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 40.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 40.4
29% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback