Asus GL502VT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAsus GL502VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VT
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160614
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateDec 30 '16 at 21:56
Run Duration436 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 194
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 548
58% 466 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Asus(1043 1140) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5954
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 35.9
Parallax 28.6
31% 34.3 fps
MRender 43
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 36.8
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
811GB free
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 468
Write 292
Mixed 293
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 18.3
112% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 37.1
80% 167 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 107%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 2,241
Write 1,135
Mixed 1,346
346% 1,574 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 44.5
189% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 141
152% 259 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 230%
Great: 254%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42% Average
Read 93.3
Write 52.1
Mixed 80.6
57% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 3.79
4K Mixed 0.29
123% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42%
Great: 88%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
165GB free
Firmware: 0304
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 63.5
Write 89.1
Mixed 65.1
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 4.51
4K Mixed 0.48
176% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 65%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 130GB
65GB free, PID 0747
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.1% Poor
Read 85.6
Write 37.2
Mixed 44.3
62% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.93
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.53
51% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 27%
Staples Relay UFD 32GB
1GB free, PID 5202
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
7.97% Terrible
Read 15.4
Write 3.45
Mixed 5.36
8% 8.06 MB/s
4K Read 3.21
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 1
93% 1.86 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.97%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB Kingston KHX2133C13S4/16G 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 18.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL502VT Builds (Compare 461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL502VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback