Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 10:59
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 213
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 721
70% 575 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 80.8
Parallax 108
63% 88.5 fps
MRender 77.2
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 64.1
59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 252 273 299 283 281 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 488
Mixed 397
SusWrite 275
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 56.3
189% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 355
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: EB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 126 130 131 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 128
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 29.8
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 27.7
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback