Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 170 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 327 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 37.6 Reflection 27.2 Parallax 48.2 31% 37.7 fps	MRender 25.9 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 33.1 26% 32 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 10 1.9 2 2 1.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 376 Write 336 Mixed 12.8 SusWrite 17.3 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 55.6 4K Mixed 19.1 80% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 0.2 44% 107 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 78%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 466GB free Firmware: 01.01S02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 131 131 131 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 142 Write 125 Mixed 104 SusWrite 131 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 029E CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples	3x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	1x

RAM
9905471-011.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 2,152 samples	2x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples	2x
99U5471-052.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,331 samples	1x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28