Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '20 at 20:03
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 81.9
82% 81.9 Pts
Poor: 73% Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 4011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.5% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 120
Parallax 119
98% 119 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 115
Splatting 96
100% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 231 222 222 227 226 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 492
Write 402
Mixed 216
SusWrite 222
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 8.8
66% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 76.7
DQ Mixed 33.1
41% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
75GB free
Firmware: VB411D43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,887
Write 1,512
Mixed 1,403
425% 1,934 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 82.4
286% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,221
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 326
432% 792 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 309%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
3TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 209 208 208 209 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 178
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 205
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 120%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 34.5
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 34.6
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback