Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-HA65M-D2H-B3 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120327
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '20 at 15:34
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345 4,997 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 93.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 506 54% 434 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% MSI(1462 8A91) CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Lighting 29.4 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 37.4 24% 32.4 fps	MRender 30.6 Gravity 30.1 Splatting 34.3 26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU 700 240GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: B170 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 118 75 74 87 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 312 Write 213 Mixed 241 SusWrite 108 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 24.4 95% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 81.4 70% 102 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 216GB free Firmware: JP2OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 80 73 70 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 103 Write 98 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 80 60% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 74%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 196GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 81 78 80 80 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 126 Write 126 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 79.7 72% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 16.4 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	12x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	5x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $102

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16