Asrock H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H67M  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '16 at 13:39
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 184
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 358
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 17.5
14% 18.1 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 17.3
Splatting 20
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 560ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48% Average
Read 334
Write 114
Mixed 179
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 13.4
74% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 41.5
57% 104 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
77GB free
Firmware: P22OABEA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 48.7
Write 46.6
Mixed 45.7
35% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.35
96% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B2873FHS-CH9 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback