MSI MS-1762

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GT70
MotherboardMSI MS-1762  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121123
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 30 '16 at 04:28
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 163
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 423
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
MSI(1462 10BC) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 2.91
4% 9.89 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.04
5% 5.42 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 122
Write 105
Mixed 83.3
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 9.16
4K Mixed 0.74
8% 3.77 MB/s
DQ Read 5.4
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 1.03
3% 5.59 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 18%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 1TB
631GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 506
Write 405
Mixed 422
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 22.7
97% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 109
124% 213 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 1TB
127GB free
Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 505
Write 402
Mixed 423
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 24.1
98% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 122
132% 222 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 128%
Esata-2 HDS723030ALA640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOA800 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 120
Write 125
Mixed 128
94% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.39
115% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
506GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 87
Mixed 78.6
63% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.25
82% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-427.A00LF 9905428-427.A00LF 9905428-427.A00LF 99U5428-018.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1762 Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1762

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback