MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '20 at 21:35
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 81.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 1,087
96% 816 Pts
64-Core 2,755
170% 2,755 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2527 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 159
Parallax 146
122% 152 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 140
Splatting 112
99% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
654GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 90 35 42 177 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 338
Write 261
Mixed 228
SusWrite 104
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 8.2
36% 8.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
143GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 96 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 145
Write 137
Mixed 80
SusWrite 95.3
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 113%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
415GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 59.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 94.1
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
422GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 40 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 29.7
Mixed 32
SusWrite 38.7
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 169 171 169 171 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 174
Mixed 131
SusWrite 170
223% 167 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
421% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 0.6
335% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 47
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 42.9
127% 44.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 37.4
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 118%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback