MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '20 at 19:09
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 1,087
96% 816 Pts
64-Core 1,370
85% 1,370 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2527 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.8% Poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 23.4
20% 25.7 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 32.5
28% 33.8 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
654GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 117 107 16 20 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 343
Write 311
Mixed 259
SusWrite 101
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 14.3
62% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 73.4
DQ Mixed 29.3
38% 69.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
143GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 97 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 140
Write 138
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 95.5
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 113%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
415GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 92 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 63.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 92.3
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
422GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 41 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 30.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 40.5
25% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 169 172 169 169 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 170
Mixed 132
SusWrite 170
222% 167 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
352% 4.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 0.6
342% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 39
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 38.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback