MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '20 at 20:00
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 81.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,074
100% 832 Pts
64-Core 1,415
88% 1,415 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 116
Parallax 249
110% 166 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 130
Splatting 161
113% 135 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1532 921 953 884 924 662 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,503
Write 2,658
Mixed 1,688
SusWrite 979
387% 1,707 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 83.6
289% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,360
DQ Write 1,182
DQ Mixed 1,263
949% 1,268 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 266%
Great: 298%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
41GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 445 446 438 443 443 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 449
Mixed 395
SusWrite 444
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 58.8
194% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
631GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 163 169 167 158 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 150
Write 142
Mixed 31
SusWrite 157
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion+ 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 106 107 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 75.3
Write 120
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 105
73% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
197% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52%
Great: 68%
Generic- SM/xD Picture 1GB
1GB free, PID 6362, FujiFilm xD-Picture Card H1GB DPC-H1GB
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.1 2.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.7% Terrible
Read 4.8
Write 2.5
Mixed 4
SusWrite 3.1
5% 3.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$118
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 37.5
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 37.2
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,092 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $993
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback