MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '20 at 18:36
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 278
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 1,096
98% 825 Pts
64-Core 1,394
86% 1,394 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 117
Parallax 245
110% 165 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 131
Splatting 163
115% 137 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 696 348 395 403 402 403 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 629
Write 1,438
Mixed 594
SusWrite 441
176% 775 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 45.5
170% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 595
445% 594 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 131%
Great: 277%
PNY CS900 480GB-$35
174GB free
Firmware: CS900112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 338 139 138 139 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 461
Write 231
Mixed 314
SusWrite 217
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 35.6
139% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 200
171% 249 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 102%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
636GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 454 478 480 481 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 486
Mixed 420
SusWrite 473
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 44.5
154% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 365
275% 366 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 113%
Great: 121%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 176 178 179 180 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
2TB free, PID ab34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 151 151 152 152 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 72%
SANDISK SDDR-489 4GB
1GB free, PID cfc9
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.9 6.6 5.6 5.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
4.58% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 6.8
Mixed 10
SusWrite 6.1
12% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
29% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.58%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3266 MHz clocked @ 1633 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 37.9
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 36.6
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $692
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback