MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B92
MotherboardMSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)  (all builds)
Memory103.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190325
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '20 at 17:00
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 96%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 40.4
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 105
37% 66 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 407
37% 312 Pts
64-Core 3,857
239% 3,857 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 185
Parallax 234
145% 199 fps
MRender 88.8
Gravity 82.3
Splatting 65.2
63% 78.8 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 114%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1124 1056 844 817 921 912 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 951
Write 1,402
Mixed 844
SusWrite 946
234% 1,036 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 23.3
92% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 463
344% 449 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 143%
Great: 459%
Amd-raid ST4000LM024-2AN1 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 110 109 112 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 5
Write 59.5
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 111
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.4
118% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 64%
Amd-raid ST4000LM024-2AN1 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 122 127 123 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 52
Write 104
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 126
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 64%
Amd-raid ST4000LM024-2AN1 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 113 111 120 118 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 47
Write 74.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 113
46% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 64%
Seagate Desktop 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 34 34 33 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 30.7
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 35.2
42% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 21%
USB Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 33 31 31 30 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 49.5
Write 34.5
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 31.8
40% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
82% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 18%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2733 MHz clocked @ 1367 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.5% Very good
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 29.1
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback