Acer Aspire X3900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire X3900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FIH57
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100403
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '20 at 07:43
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 141
55% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 202
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Sapphire(174B E193) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.46% Terrible
Lighting 7.27
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 6
6% 6.77 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 5.57
4% 5.58 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.46%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
596GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 63 68 69 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 78
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 56
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 61%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
385GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 24.2
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 25
17% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.4
138% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 14.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3900 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback