HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844C
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191121
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '20 at 21:55
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 275
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 839
81% 668 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
HP(103C 8554) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 122
Parallax 137
104% 129 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 123
Splatting 98.8
104% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 727
Write 284
Mixed 611
119% 541 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 37.9
134% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 76.1
139% 291 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 147%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
7GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 371
Write 358
Mixed 340
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 28.7
93% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 122
90% 117 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: VX14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 213 212 218 218 220 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 158
Mixed 76
SusWrite 215
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
446GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 117 119 120 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 118
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
465GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 119 120 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 72
SusWrite 118
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
2TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 105 104 103 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
43% Average
Read 99
Write 101
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 103
121% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 04CB M378A1K43CB2-CTD 04CB 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 25.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 25.6
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-00xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback