Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3009-A1
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120524
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 29 '20 at 16:59
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 78
2-Core 173
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 332
43% 325 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8417) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.46 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 135 136 137 121 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 133
Write 181
Mixed 154
SusWrite 130
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 23
76% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 147
119% 169 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
20GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 100 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 92.1
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 99.4
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 167 164 163 168 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 110
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 164
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51272BA1339.M18F Samsung M391B5273DH0-YH9 CT51272BA1339.M18F Samsung M391B5273DH0-YH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY TX100 S3 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $504
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback