| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Pro3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180313 |
| Uptime | 7.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 28 '20 at 13:10 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
59.7%
Above average
|
65% 107 Pts
|
29% 219 Pts
|
14% 233 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
|
32.1%
Below average
|
32% 36.8 fps
|
32% 39.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 247 287 264 284 275 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
35% 156 MB/s
|
47% 15 MB/s
|
11% 15.3 MB/s
|
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
738GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 27 28 28 MB/s
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
34% 26.1 MB/s
|
70% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM1333KLH-4G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.5%
Average
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
53% 75.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z77 Pro3 Builds (Compare 1,283 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro3 - $212
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 461x |
| Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 199x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 175x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 119x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 88x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 74x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $492 |