Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '20 at 00:23
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 97.4 2-Core 194 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 382 51% 382 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 250 5,461 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Gigabyte(1458 22CA) 2GB CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	8.48% Terrible	Lighting 10.6 Reflection 12.7 Parallax 14.3 9% 12.5 fps	MRender 7.43 Gravity 11 Splatting 10.9 8% 9.79 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.48% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 486 487 487 490 486 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200 7,034 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 76GB free Firmware: R211 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 152 152 141 141 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 427 Write 111 Mixed 176 SusWrite 142 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 20.4 80% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 58.9 DQ Mixed 68.1 60% 91.6 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 91%
Seagate ST2000VN 004-2E4164 2TB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 76 74 76 75 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30% Below average	Read 31 Write 60.8 Mixed 37 SusWrite 73.5 37% 50.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 99U5471-054.A00LF 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 17.3 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H87M-D3H Builds (Compare 617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	161x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	83x
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	71x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	36x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $36Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	20x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	18x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $108

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16