Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 00:11
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 382
50% 374 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 250
Gigabyte(1458 22CA) 2GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
8.59% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 14
9% 12.6 fps
MRender 7.48
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.83 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.59%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 892 462 481 484 484 406 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
76GB free
Firmware: R211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 153 151 148 98 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 417
Write 103
Mixed 166
SusWrite 131
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 22.6
82% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 60.8
DQ Mixed 73.8
65% 101 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST2000VN 004-2E4164 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 72 71 74 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 18.2
Write 61.3
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 72.5
34% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 99U5471-054.A00LF 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 17.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87M-D3H Builds (Compare 616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback