HP 550-185na

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 550-185na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 19:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 63
2-Core 116
48% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 185
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics + R5 Dual Graphics
HP(103C 2B53) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 7.23
Reflection 8.27
Parallax 9.69
6% 8.4 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 8.43
6% 7.42 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 101 84 71 67 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 430
Write 152
Mixed 174
SusWrite 83.5
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 27.9
111% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 150
125% 184 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
480GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 143 146 143 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 157
Write 142
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 143
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G9P1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.3% Poor
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.7
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback