Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka) 31,243 User benchmarks, average bench 42% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 63.9 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 127 50% 85.1 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 193 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics + R5 Dual Graphics 22 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 2B53) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.12% Terrible	Lighting 7.43 Reflection 8 Parallax 9.72 6% 8.38 fps	MRender 6.67 Gravity 7.27 Splatting 8.52 6% 7.49 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.12% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB 5,673 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02H0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 131 Write 65.4 Mixed 50 18% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 16.2 84% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 53.5 DQ Mixed 22.5 22% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 480GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 143 146 148 147 148 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 156 Write 149 Mixed 103 SusWrite 146 102% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G9P1 2x4GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.9% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 12.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.7 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16