Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	GIGABYTE GB-BPCE-3455
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MZAPLBP-00 (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190310
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '20 at 15:48
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 45 1-Core 44.4 2-Core 65.3 32% 51.6 Pts	4-Core 45.8 8-Core 78.6 8% 62.2 Pts	64-Core 63.2 4% 63.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.31% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 2 1% 1.68 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 1.52 2% 2.09 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.31% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 111 132 145 156 156 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 360 Write 271 Mixed 271 SusWrite 150 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 1.7 23% 6.57 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 7.2 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	12x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16