Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	83.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	114.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140704
Uptime	3.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '20 at 11:47
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 1,402 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 65.4 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 138 54% 91.5 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 417 42% 342 Pts	64-Core 969 60% 969 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 112 Parallax 115 86% 111 fps	MRender 95.3 Gravity 98.2 Splatting 94.3 78% 95.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 358GB free Firmware: 00RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 228 236 231 235 232 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57% Above average	Read 220 Write 235 Mixed 157 SusWrite 231 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 17.8 85% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 142 122% 180 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 408 303 180 126 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 429 Write 419 Mixed 340 SusWrite 253 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 38.4 112% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 223 167% 222 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-483.A00 8x16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	89% Excellent	MC Read 43.7 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 35.8 106% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.6 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $378

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16