Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150827
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '16 at 21:24
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 93.9 1-Core 114 2-Core 230 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 462 61% 460 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 122 Parallax 103 94% 114 fps	MRender 99.8 Gravity 105 Splatting 105 85% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 36GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 443 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 33 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 54 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2165784753	69.2% Good	Read 468 Write 261 Mixed 271 73% 333 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 15.1 112% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 33.6 DQ Write 73.2 DQ Mixed 68.5 48% 58.4 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 123%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 41540924593523 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1128 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 551 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 551 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1577513 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 48 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1577513 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1478255 (F9) Unknown 100 100 49069	68% Good	Read 499 Write 172 Mixed 249 67% 306 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 15 111% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 33.8 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 10.8 41% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 95%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 82GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 239 181 1041 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2834 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15616 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1376 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 260 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2834 (C2) HDA temperature 110 93 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 780906 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.1% Average	Read 86.1 Write 77.6 Mixed 75.1 60% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.32 98% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 69%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 17GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 127 Write 32.2 Mixed 43.5 68% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.28 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.77 89% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.2% Average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.4 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,638x
Core i5-4690KIntel $50Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	456x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	225x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	410x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	232x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	161x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	108x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	105x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	80x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	110x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	107x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	92x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $925

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359