Asrock X570 AQUA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 AQUA  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 19:12
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 151
2-Core 303
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,141
103% 866 Pts
64-Core 2,219
137% 2,219 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2382) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 4012 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 44.6
39% 48.9 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 136
74% 83.7 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,413
Write 7,066
Mixed 8,454
1,919% 8,645 MB/s
4K Read 597
4K Write 465
4K Mixed 485
1,773% 516 MB/s
DQ Read 1,649
DQ Write 1,405
DQ Mixed 1,474
1,119% 1,509 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
554GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1942 1906 1712 1711 1716 1710 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,533
Write 1,933
Mixed 1,782
SusWrite 1,783
450% 2,008 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 91.4
305% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,337
DQ Write 1209
DQ Mixed 1,255
946% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 362%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2549 2575 2546 1709 1580 1597 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
390% Outstanding
Read 2,642
Write 2,478
Mixed 1,984
SusWrite 2,092
517% 2,299 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 94.3
320% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,370
DQ Write 1,219
DQ Mixed 1,302
974% 1,297 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 390%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 48.5
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 45.2
129% 45.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 40.5
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 121%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 AQUA Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 194%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 232%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 AQUA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback