Asrock X570 AQUA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 AQUA  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 11:51
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 152
2-Core 283
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,041
98% 813 Pts
64-Core 2,096
130% 2,096 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2382) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 4012 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.7% Above average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 44.5
39% 49 fps
MRender 282
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 62
97% 130 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,201
Write 7,168
Mixed 8,315
1,901% 8,561 MB/s
4K Read 600
4K Write 460
4K Mixed 480
1,768% 513 MB/s
DQ Read 1,645
DQ Write 1,374
DQ Mixed 1,458
1,106% 1,492 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
554GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1882 1887 1752 1718 1711 1718 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,480
Write 1,837
Mixed 1,745
SusWrite 1,778
439% 1,960 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 91.5
302% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,311
DQ Write 1,167
DQ Mixed 1,242
931% 1240 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 357%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2575 2567 2560 1692 1590 1600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
384% Outstanding
Read 2,494
Write 2,474
Mixed 2,021
SusWrite 2,097
512% 2,272 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 94.4
317% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,363
DQ Write 1,212
DQ Mixed 1,295
969% 1,290 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 384%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 42.4
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 35.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 114%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 AQUA Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 194%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 232%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 AQUA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback