Acer MA50_HX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer MA50_HX  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer MA50_HX
Memory8.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 17:26
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2367M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 36.3
2-Core 65.5
42% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 91.7
8-Core 93.1
12% 92.4 Pts
64-Core 94.1
6% 94.1 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 067D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.72 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 163 100 101 101 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 424
Write 236
Mixed 329
SusWrite 156
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 26.1
96% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 205
170% 243 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 10GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback