Acer MA50_HX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer MA50_HX  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer MA50_HX
Memory8.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130313
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 13:56
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2367M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 66.9
42% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 92.6
8-Core 92.4
12% 92.5 Pts
64-Core 94.4
6% 94.4 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 067D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 1.25
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.43
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 126 100 103 100 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 398
Write 131
Mixed 320
SusWrite 148
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 15.7
78% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 203
176% 261 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 10GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback