Asrock X299 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 133% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 147% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X299 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	118.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180226
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '20 at 19:43
Run Duration	343 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 77.4 1-Core 128 2-Core 254 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 507 8-Core 1,022 90% 764 Pts	64-Core 1,754 109% 1,754 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	152% Outstanding	Lighting 208 Reflection 233 Parallax 231 170% 224 fps	MRender 258 Gravity 213 Splatting 127 155% 199 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1425 1236 1149 1057 976 898 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	286% Outstanding	Read 2,338 Write 1,766 Mixed 1,209 SusWrite 1,124 359% 1,609 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 192 4K Mixed 78.9 267% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,047 DQ Write 803 DQ Mixed 957 707% 936 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 286% Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 101GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,238 Write 2090 Mixed 1,545 436% 1,958 MB/s	4K Read 62.5 4K Write 163 4K Mixed 84.9 290% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,128 DQ Write 936 DQ Mixed 1,038 776% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
SanDisk X400 1TB-$310 2,086 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 68GB free Firmware: X4140000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 204 239 240 239 237 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Read 364 Write 343 Mixed 246 SusWrite 225 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 78.6 4K Mixed 41.8 134% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 191 150% 208 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 106%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 112GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 164 127 126 126 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 370 Write 345 Mixed 280 SusWrite 143 64% 284 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 46.3 160% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 209 155% 205 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 110%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154 3,810 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 155 161 159 158 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 169 Mixed 59 SusWrite 158 103% 142 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 290% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 531GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 105 100 104 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 137 Write 141 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 102 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 246% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 455GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 118 119 118 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 144 Write 146 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 119 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 244% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x16GB 2,632 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 35.4 MC Write 59.3 MC Mixed 36 124% 43.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 10 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 Taichi Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Taichi

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	57x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	42x
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	34x

GPU
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	30x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	17x
870 EVO 2TBSamsung $172Bench 113%, 31,076 samples	11x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA256TCK 256GBBench 161%, 2,141 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	49x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	24x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $717

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16