Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3398
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '20 at 13:19
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470S 14,631 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 186 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 353 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3398) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.75% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.38 2% 1.65 fps	MRender 3.62 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.52 2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.75% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 160GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102M3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 102 104 100 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 245 Write 104 Mixed 130 SusWrite 102 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 10.2 61% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 86.2 DQ Mixed 85.5 76% 116 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GU6C2303EP0200 Kingston 99U5428-014.A00G 4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.4% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 10.3 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	401x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	77x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	37x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	14x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	12x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28