Asus P8H61

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	96.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '20 at 08:57
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368 2,442 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 96.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 218 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 526 60% 471 Pts	64-Core 533 33% 533 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$290 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Nvidia(10DE 12FD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3825 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 124 Parallax 125 99% 124 fps	MRender 152 Gravity 106 Splatting 91.5 92% 116 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5768 Write 4,969 Mixed 5,154 1,181% 5,297 MB/s	4K Read 387 4K Write 209 4K Mixed 45.8 755% 214 MB/s	DQ Read 96.8 DQ Write 720 DQ Mixed 711 459% 509 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69 25,452 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 161GB free Firmware: UG500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 30 136 69 172 177 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.8% Below average	Read 212 Write 187 Mixed 112 SusWrite 125 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 17.5 56% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 19 DQ Write 26.6 DQ Mixed 20.3 16% 22 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 60%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50 5,600 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 37GB free Firmware: GN001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 62 62 62 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 72.5 Write 70.3 Mixed 45.3 SusWrite 61.4 46% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.6% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 20.5 63% 22.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 19.3 54% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 52.5 76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 - $77

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	41x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	40x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	19x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	10x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,159 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $213

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16