Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 26 '16 at 16:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 139
57% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 229
31% 228 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 2.19
16% 12.7 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 16.7
17% 22 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 240GB-$200
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 308
Write 229
Mixed 259
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 10.7
88% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 9.38
17% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 95%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
33GB free
Firmware: GM4OA57A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 66
Write 62.5
Mixed 43.5
43% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.19
71% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A CT51264BA160B 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2H Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $14
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback