Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 04:06
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 85
1-Core 123
2-Core 235
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 772
77% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,122
69% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
135% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 192
Parallax 187
145% 186 fps
MRender 229
Gravity 189
Splatting 117
140% 179 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 135%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2277
Write 1,220
Mixed 1,461
364% 1,652 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 67.1
219% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 571
DQ Write 455
DQ Mixed 509
382% 512 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
110GB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 433 445 457 456 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 447
Mixed 445
SusWrite 439
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 48.8
166% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 272
208% 282 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
103GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 443 455 468 465 469 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 469
Mixed 404
SusWrite 450
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 51.5
174% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
596GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 165 166 166 166 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 122
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 164
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
320GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 123 123 122 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 110
Write 112
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 122
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
524GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 167 168 168 168 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 145
Mixed 105
SusWrite 167
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96%
Great: 109%
STT EXPRESS ST1 8GB
6GB free, PID 0311
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Read 1.8
Write 16.8
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 14.1
18% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C14-8GTRS 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 35.7
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO Builds (Compare 1,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback